My StumbleUpon Page
Online slang: fad or here to stay?
Posted by robertstevenson on May 9, 2008
Will online slang like OMG, IMO, lol, and LMHO fizzle out like a fad or remain with us indefinitely.
According to Wictionary, “A fad is something that is very popular with a small group of people for a short period of time.”
Take a look at the last century of fads, and see if you can find a common bond.
Silent Films (1900s), Foxtrot (10s) Pez (20s), zoot suits (30s) slinkys (40s), hula-hoops (50s), troll dolls (60s) pet rocks (70s), Big hair (80s), tickle me elmo (90s), online slang (20s)
Among those who participate in fads, there is a camaraderie, a sort of club membership (remember M
embers Only jackets) in participating in the current popular phenomenon. Those left out are often labeled as uncool or nerdy. So do you have to conform with the mainstream to join a fad? Not necessarily. Many counterculture fads exist: from lip piercing to Mohawks.
Some fads are propelled by marketers like the Black Friday ads for Tickle Me Elmo, and 
some occur spontaneously like holding up cell phones at concerts. Either way a fad is fun and rewarding for those who join in.
What do you think about textspeech or online slang? Are you a member of this “club”? Will these acronyms spread to the unplugged? Do you use these abbreviations at all, just for texting, on all online communication, or all printed communication?
Do you ever use online slang in oral communication? If you feel like it, leave me a comment. I’d love to hear from you about this.
May 9, 2008 at 9:41 am
INteresting article.
I don’t think that i have ever used Online slang in oral communication except for when I’m making a point about it.
However common online, the real beneficial use of many of these are in short messaging, first cellphones and now short message sites like Twitter are seeing it increasing heavy.
I think that the language as such is going to change to adapt to it. 50 years ago. When someone said Ram, they meant a male goat, today, almost no one will make that association unless the speaker is dressed in camouflage and sporting a gun.
Most of these abbreviations will probably never make it into mainstream conversations because they depict non verbal communication. Smileys, LOL’s and all the other things that come across naturally in face to face or phone conversations.
I for one think that its use will become more widespread because of its connection to the text message. Something that i feel has become a norm of interpersonal communication.
May 9, 2008 at 1:26 pm
I hate all that slang. It really annoys me when I receive a text message filled with it. Most times I don’t even read it, just hit the delete button. If it’s that important whoever sent it can phone me, or send me a message is some sort of cohesive English.
May 9, 2008 at 5:45 pm
I agree with Jon, it’s ridiculous and I don’t see it expanding beyond short messages that pretty much have to be abbreviated in such a way.